10 Thu hồi Thực phẩm Đắt tiền

Hãy mở đầu danh sách đáng buồn này bằng cách nói rằng chúng tôi gặt hái được rất nhiều lợi ích từ quá trình toàn cầu hóa các sản phẩm thực phẩm. Đầu tiên, chế độ ăn uống của chúng ta đã trở nên đa dạng hơn và chúng ta có thể tìm thấy các loại thực phẩm có nguồn gốc từ tất cả các nơi khác nhau trên thế giới trong cửa hàng tạp hóa địa phương của chúng ta. Nhưng cũng có những mặt trái. Thứ nhất, khi bạn chưa trưởng thành hoặc tự giết bữa tối của mình, bạn không thể chắc chắn nó đã ở đâu. Chúng ta phải dựa vào các công ty và sự giám sát của chính phủ để đảm bảo những gì chúng ta đang ăn là an toàn - và như chúng ta sẽ thấy, nó không phải lúc nào cũng hiệu quả.

Theo Trung tâm Kiểm soát Dịch bệnh (CDC), các bệnh truyền qua thực phẩm gây ra khoảng 300.000 ca nhập viện và 5.000 ca tử vong hàng năm ở Hoa Kỳ [nguồn: CDC ]. Nguyên nhân phổ biến là do sự bùng phát của vi khuẩn như salmonella và E. coli. Có vẻ như mỗi khi công chúng bắt đầu lấy lại niềm tin vào an toàn xử lý thực phẩm, một câu chuyện mới lại nổ ra về một vụ thu hồi thực phẩm lớn khác.

Những đợt bùng phát này không chỉ là đòn giáng mạnh vào sức khỏe nạn nhân mà còn ảnh hưởng đến nền kinh tế. Tại Hoa Kỳ, nền kinh tế xuất huyết khoảng 7 tỷ đô la mỗi năm do những đợt bùng phát này [nguồn: Washington Times ]. Các chi phí thu hồi, bao gồm đưa thực phẩm ra khỏi kệ, xử lý các vụ kiện , cải tạo nhà máy và sửa chữa các mối quan hệ công chúng , có thể rất lớn đối với các công ty. Và đó là chưa tính đến danh tiếng bị ô nhiễm và doanh số bán hàng bị mất có thể khó kiếm tiền.

Trong vài trang tiếp theo, chúng ta sẽ điểm qua một số vụ thu hồi lớn nhất và tác động tàn phá của chúng đối với các công ty.

1. Jack in the Box Burgers
2. Nước ép táo Odwalla
3. Thịt bò Hudson
4. Sara Lee Deli Sản phẩm
5. Rau chân vịt
6. Peter Pan bơ đậu phộng
7. Thực đơn Thức ăn Thức ăn cho Vật nuôi
8. Westland / Thịt Hallmark
9. Cà chua
10. Sản phẩm đậu phộng

­

­

Vụ việc này đã được chứng minh là một trong những đợt bùng phát bệnh truyền qua thực phẩm nghiêm trọng nhất từ ​​trước đến nay và đánh thức mọi người về sự nguy hiểm của vi khuẩn E.coli. Chuỗi nhà hàng thức ăn nhanh Jack in the Box bắt đầu bán bánh mì kẹp thịt bị nhiễm vi khuẩn E.coli vào năm 1992. Ngay sau đó, hàng trăm người bị ốm và 4 trẻ em không chống chọi nổi với bệnh tật và qua đời.

Điều này đặc biệt bi thảm vì nó có thể ngăn ngừa được. Mặc dù thịt sống đã bị nhiễm khuẩn, nhưng nấu ở nhiệt độ đủ cao (155 độ F hoặc 68,3 độ C) sẽ có thể giết chết vi khuẩn E.coli và làm cho nó an toàn để ăn. Tuy nhiên, tiêu chuẩn của Cục Quản lý Thực phẩm và Dược phẩm (FDA) tại thời điểm này chỉ yêu cầu thịt phải được nấu chín tới 140 độ F (60 độ C). Khi vụ bê bối này chứng minh rằng nhiệt độ không phù hợp, FDA đã nâng yêu cầu lên 155 độ (và cuối cùng là 160 độ hoặc 71,1 độ C).

Khi mối liên hệ với hamburger của họ bị phát hiện, công ty điều hành nhà hàng, Foodmaker Inc., đã ban hành lệnh thu hồi, trong đó họ thu hồi khoảng 20% ​​số thịt bò bị nhiễm độc [nguồn: MarlerClark ]. Foodmaker đã mất khoảng 160 triệu đô la doanh thu và 30% giá trị thị trường chứng khoán do hậu quả của vụ bê bối [nguồn: MarlerClark , Nestle ]. Họ đã đề nghị thanh toán các chi phí y tế của nạn nhân mà "không có ràng buộc nào kèm theo" [nguồn: AP ]. Tuy nhiên, cuối cùng họ đã trả hàng chục triệu cho các bộ quần áo hành động cá nhân và tập thể.

­­

­

Consumers became more wary about underco­oked hamburger after the Jack in the Box incident, but no one was expecting the next big outbreak to concern a staple of the health-conscious diet: apple juice. Though the company prides itself in being the healthy choice, Odwalla learned a lesson in the importance of pasteurization in 1996. That year, its ap­ple juice became contaminated with E. coli, resulting in the death of one 16-month-old and dozens more cases of illness.

The recall caused the company's stock to plummet and cost the company more than $12 million [source: ERS/USDA]. This isn't including lost sales, lawsuits and a federal fine of $1.5 million. Odwalla executives pleaded ignorance, as they admitted they didn't realize that E. coli could survive in acidic apple juice [source: Drew]. As a result of the outbreak, the company began pasteurizing its apple juice, and the fruit juice industry (which had previous­ly been self-regulated for the most part) became more tightly regulated [source: Weier].

­

A year after the Odwalla apple juice outbreak, the nation was struggling with E. coli yet again. This time, it led to the largest meat recall ever seen at that point. In 1997, Hudson sold beef that was contaminated with E. coli, sickening at least 16 people, five of whom were hospitalized (luckily, none died) [source: Neusner].

On Aug. 12, the USDA ordered Hudson to recall 20 million pounds (more than 9 million kilograms) of their ground beef, making this one of few recalls on this list that weren't voluntary [source: Smith]. Soon, this number rose to 25 million pounds (more than 11 million kilograms). The most crippling effect was not direct recall costs, but the loss of Hudson's best customer, fast-food giant Burger King, on Aug. 23.

A few days later, Hudson sold the beef-processing plant that was the source of the outbreak. But, even without that plant, the company suffered from a tainted brand name. By early September, Tyson Foods offered to buy the company for $642.4 million -- much less than it was worth a year earlier [source: Neusner]. Though Hudson founders had previously turned down offers to sell, this time it was an offer they couldn't refuse.

­

In one of the largest meat recalls in history, Sara Lee Corp. recalled about 35 million pounds (almost 16,000 tons) of their deli products and hot dogs in December 1998 [source: Perl]­. Cases of listeria had been linked to the meat from a Bil Mar Foods plant. Never heard of listeriosis? It's not as well known as E. coli and salmonella, but it happens to be more deadly. In this case, it's believed the outbreak contributed to 21 deaths and more than 100 cases of illness [source: New York Times].

The recall itself cost about $76 million [source: Licking]. But that isn't counting the millions more the company would later fork over in lawsuits. In addition, it spent about $25 million to renovate the Bil Mar plant [source: Barboza]. There, it pointed to the presence of debris, old meat and a roach infestation as possible contributors to the outbreak.

­

In September 2006, the FDA warned U.S. consumers to stop eating fresh spinach. Apparently, Popeye's favorite leafy green vegetable was making people sick with E. coli. The company Natural Selection Foods issued a voluntary recall of their spinach products, and supermarkets pulled the product from their shelves. The outbreak eventually took at least three lives and made hundreds of people sick [source: Sung].

The U.S. spinach industry, meanwhile, took a harsh blow. Recall costs and estimated sales losses amounted to a staggering $350 million [source: Weise]. And the industry was only very slowly able to regain consumer confidence in the product.

Investigators were unable to pin down exactly how the spinach got contaminated with the disease. One suspicion is that farmers used contaminated water to irrigate the crops [source: Sander]. As a preventive measure, the spinach industry came up with stricter rules for growing spinach, including expanding the buffer required between crops and pasture areas [source: Schmit].

­

­

In early 2007, consumers heard that they shou­ld stop buying and eating the popular Peter Pan brand of peanut butter . Apparently, an outbreak of salmonella had been linked to the product. When it discovered the link, the company that made this peanut butter, ConAgra, engaged in a rare and massive 100-percent recall of the product. And later that year, the company recalled frozen pot pies that were also found to be linked to the outbreak.

After everything was said and done, the outbreak caused more than 600 cases of salmonella but luckily, no deaths. ConAgra spent around $78 million on the recalls [source: Nash]. These funds went into not only finding and getting rid of the products, but also notifying customers and implementing a toll-free hotline for consumers to contact. On top of shelling out this money, the company missed out on approximately $55 million worth of lost sales [source: Hughlett].

Investigations into the cause of the outbreak revealed that moisture (from broken sprinklers and rain leaking through the roof) was the culprit that fostered an environment hospitable to the bacteria. ConAgra then poured another $15 to $20 million into renovating the responsible plant [source: Nash].

­­

One of the biggest food recalls ever actually had to do with the stuff we give our furry friends -- pet food was at the center of the problem in this case. And unlike most other recalls on our list, this one didn't have to do with the outbreak of a bacterial disease. Rather, it's believed an industrial chemical known as melamine contaminated the wheat-gluten in the food. When the chemical enters an animal's system, it can cause kidney failure and possibly death. The melamine-contaminated wheat-gluten is thought to have come from a Chinese supplier.

In 2007, after the deaths of 14 cats and dogs were linked to their products, Menu Foods started a recall of about 60 million cans and packages of pet food [source: Reuters]. However, it wasn't able to prevent thousands more animal sicknesses and deaths [source: Barboza].

Menu Foods had to dish out about $42 million dollars to pay for the recall, not including lost sales [source: Henderson]. By 2009, after the company reached a $24-million settlement, affected pet-owners were able to receive damages due to veterinary bills [source: Jones]. This was in addition to the $8 million already paid out to affected consumers [source: Schneider].

­

In February 2008, this became the largest meat recall in history. Interestingly, despite its massive scope, the recall didn't come as a result of illness reports.

Rather, the drama began when the Humane Society of the United States released an undercover video on Jan. 30, 2008, depicting employees of Westland/Hallmark mistreating sick cows [source: Martin]. The video caused the company to shut down voluntarily and raised the attention of the USDA, which launched investigations. Although their cows passed initial inspection, the company allegedly failed to alert inspectors when the cows became too sick to walk before slaughter. Such circumstances increased the risk that the meat carried mad cow disease.

Westland/Hallmark voluntarily submitted to the USDA's request for the recall of more than 143 million pounds (almost 65 million kilograms) worth of beef, even though health risks were "remote" [source: USDA]. This meat spanned two years of their production and much of it was already consumed before the recall was announced. The initial burdens of paying for the recall have fallen on retailers and schools among other recipients [source: Schmit]. Organizations have been tallying the damage and seeking reimbursement from Westland/Hallmark. By some estimates, the total will amount to about $117 million [source: Goad]. It's unlikely the company will ever reopen.

­

When a rare form of salmonella broke out in May 2008, the CDC and the FD­A tried to track down the cause. Before it was over, the outbreak caused hundreds of hospitalizations and was linked to a few deaths [source: Hsu].

Early on, the FDA decided to warn the public off tomatoes, which was one of the likely culprits it was closing in on. Unfortunately, it was wrong. But, for the months until it ultimately traced the outbreak to peppers from a farm in Mexico, the tomato industry suffered expensive recalls.

Although tomatoes weren't really tainted with salmonella, tomato farmers had to foot the bill for recalls. Not only that, but farmers destroyed crops of tomatoes when the cost of picking them outweighed expected profits [source: Schmit]. Some estimates peg losses (including costs of recalls and lost sales) to be as high as $250 million for the industry as a whole [source: Enis].

This last recall was vast, and the outbreak deadly. By early January 2009, the FDA had linked a deadly salmonella outbreak to a Georgia plant belonging to Peanut Corporation of America (PCA), and the company immediately ordered a recall. Since the initial recall, another PCA plant in Texas was implicated and the number of recalled products amounted to more than 2,000 [source: Cook].

In addition to being among the largest recalls ever, it's also been one of the most dramatic. A criminal investigation into the outbreak has been uncovering startling evidence that PCA might have knowingly shipped products after salmonella tests came back positive, and in other cases, after retests came up negative or before test results came back at all [source: Schmit]. Whether that's true or not, the resulting outbreak has caused nine deaths and more than 600 cases of illness [source: Cook].

PCA has permanently closed down as a result. But like other devastating recalls, innocent companies have had to bear the initial costs. Kellogg has reported losing $70 million, and other smaller companies are struggling to survive -- the manufacturer Forward Foods filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy [source: Newsday].

After inspecting a list like this, it's never been clearer that history repeats itself. But it's also testament to how incredibly complex the food production and distribution systems have become in the modern world.

For more interesting lists, browse the links on the next page.

Related Articles